Fallout: New Vegas Director Josh Sawyer Says He Does “Just About Everything” to Stop Save-Scumming

We’ve all done it. You fail a lockpick, a speech check goes badly, or a fight goes sideways, so you quietly load your last save and try again. It’s called save-scumming, and one of the most respected RPG designers in the business is not a fan.

Josh Sawyer, director of Fallout: New Vegas and Pillars of Eternity, says he does “just about everything” he can to discourage it, as highlighted by Pirat_Nation on X.

Players pick the safe option, even when it’s boring

Sawyer’s argument is simple: given the chance, many players will choose the safest option, even when it makes the game more tedious for them. If reloading guarantees the best result, a lot of people will reload until they get it, and end up flattening the very choices that make an RPG interesting.

That’s the designer’s dilemma. Players say they want freedom, but if one path is risk-free, many will take it every time and then feel the game lacks tension.

Why you can’t just shoot the lock in New Vegas

One of the clearest examples is in New Vegas itself. Sawyer avoided letting players simply shoot locked containers open. His reasoning was that many players would just keep reloading their save until the shot gave them the loot, instead of investing points in the Lockpicking skill.

Gating locks behind skill makes your character build matter. If you put points into Lockpicking, you get into places others can’t. If you didn’t, that safe stays shut and you have to live with it. That’s a big part of why New Vegas builds still feel so distinct, more than fifteen years later.

“More cynical about player behavior”

Interestingly, Sawyer doesn’t think he went far enough everywhere. He says he wishes he had been “more cynical about player behavior” when designing Pillars of Eternity, suggesting there were systems in that game players could exploit by reloading more than he intended.

Is save-scumming really a problem?

This one splits players. Some points for each side:

• For designers like Sawyer: consequences only matter if you can’t undo them, and builds only feel unique if your skills actually limit you.
• For players: it’s a single-player game, people have limited time, and nobody wants to lose an hour of progress to one bad roll.
• The middle ground: many modern RPGs use checkpoint saves, Ironman modes or checks that can’t simply be retried, so players who want the challenge can opt in.

Either way, it’s a reminder of how much thought goes into small choices like whether a bullet can open a lock, and why New Vegas is still held up as one of the best-designed RPGs ever made.

Are you a save-scummer or do you live with your choices? Join the conversation in the PakGamersHub forums or the chat.

Source: Pirat_Nation on X.

As an Amazon Associate, PakGamersHub earns from qualifying purchases.